| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4 |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:24:41 -0700 |
Ken Norton wrote: > Note: ... The 35/2.8 is a silvernosed one, but the 24/2.8 is the blacknosed > version. > Back to your old tricks, I see; commenting on style, rather than substance. Both are x.ZUIKOs, and thus SC. Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] question for Doctor Monitor, if he exists, Scott Gomez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, DrT (George Themelis) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |