Me thinks Brian is a fine landscape photographer who expects his E3 to
operate like an OM-1. When he finally comes to grips with the
differences and learns to make the E3 do what he wants he'll unleash
what's waiting under the surface.
Chuck Norcutt
bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Not meaning to pick on Brian, but "digital doesn't cut the mustard
> for landscapes" is, well, hooey. More accurately, perhaps, the E-3
> doesn't cut it. Or maybe the operator isn't familiar enough with his
> equipment. Or tried to push it too far. Who knows?
>
> I spent Saturday at the annual Gallery opening at John Paul
> Caponigro's. First display of prints from his third trip to
> Antarctica. Let me tell you something from the bottom of my heart:
> Digital cuts the mustard. It cuts the jar the mustard came in. It
> cuts the truck that delivered the jars of mustard.
>
> Frankly, this whole digital v. film argument gives me indigestion,
> and I intend to stop reading them. Both are good. Both have
> strengths, both have weaknesses. Digital is here to stay. Film will
> be around for a long, long time. Let us get over ourselves and
> concentrate on images.
>
> Images are all that matters.
>
> My 2 cents, as always, worth what you paid for it.
>
> --Bob Whitmire www.bwp33.com
>
>
> ---- Brian Swale <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Sorry this is so late ...
>>
>> Here's an example of why I think digital doesn't cut the mustard
>> for landscapes. The top two links at
>> http://www.brianswale.com/zuikoholics/index.htm
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|