Surely you have breeze and wind in Hong Kong? The OM-4 is more likely
to time out for me as I wait for a flower to come to rest long enough
to shoot. But I'm not complaining. This is just an observation
relative to the E cameras' readiness to shoot, which I have found even
better than the OM-4 in this one regard. But then even that's not
really a fair comparison in all respects since no E-body can do
multispot readings.
Joel W.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:13 AM, C.H.Ling<ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't see this problem on my OM4, to wake up the camera all I need to do
> is just slightly touch the edge of the release button (just confirmed this
> with my OM4 again). I also don't see any problem with "time-out" on OM4 as
> it is 2 minutes long. More than 2 minutes? .... the light might have been
> changed and you need to re-take the reading again :-)
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> As far as sleep to shot timing goes, I've found the OM-4 (which I'm
>> using for the Kodachrome project) more irritating than I ever have
>> found the E cameras to be. But the circumstance is special in nature
>> because the camera is usually on tripod, often with a cable release
>> screwed in, and the camera goes to sleep and I lose my multispot
>> readings. It's even tricky to get the camera to wake up again as you
>> have to push in the cable release far enough to wake it up without
>> going so far as to take the picture.
>>
>> My retrospective on the OM system is that I'd like to have had an
>> OM-2N with multispot metering or an OM-4 with an on-off switch.
>>
>> Still, it's a blast to be shooting slide film again with an OM camera.
>> I need to use the memo switch more!
>>
>> Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|