No, my E-1 was very slow (~2s), the E-3 was much faster, DPR quoted ~1s.
Anything in the 0.5s range is ok with me.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker"
> Nor for me, Joel. But the 2 secs is quite long. The sequence on both
> E-420, E-3 and E-1 seemed to be around half a second. Is it possible
> that DPR is exaggerating?
>
> Chris
>
> On 29 Jul 2009, at 22:59, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
>>> "The traditional Olympus anti-dust sequence at startup also detracts
>>> from the sense of responsiveness, slowing the startup time to two
>>> seconds. This isn't a long time to wait in general terms but is
>>> enough
>>> to stop you ripping the camera from your pocket if something
>>> unexpected
>>> happens - you know the camera won't be ready in time."
>>
>> I would like the option of cleaning at startup or shutdown -- my
>> option. But having owned now three Oly DSLRs with this feature, the
>> objection is totally theoretical in nature and casts doubts on most
>> other observations because it merely builds upon the cobwebs of some
>> reviewer's brain, as evidenced in the language: "detracts from the
>> sense of ..." I have never missed a shot I wanted because of this
>> feature. Never. Non-issue.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|