Subject: | Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:01:18 +0800 |
BTW, what software you used for converting the 16 bit tiff to PNG? Photoshop didn't do very well, only compressed my 16bit color file from 66MB to around 52MB and it is much slower than saving tiff. C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: "C.H.Ling" >I belive RAW is the best lossless format for digital camera. I only use RAW > mainly because of the excellent W/B and exposure control in RAW converter. > > C.H.Ling > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dawid Loubser" > >> PNG really is a wonderful format, it's unbelievable that cameras >> didn't just use it as the de-facto >> lossless format. A 80MB 16bit TIFF is easily quartered in size by >> storing it as a 16-bit PNG, with >> zero information loss (with some of my typical images, YMMV). > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] shadow detail, was: sunset this evening, C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] [OT] The Duck, AS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | [OM] [OT] The Duck, AS |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |