Subject: | Re: [OM] sunset this evening |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:55:28 -0400 |
Usually I don't care but every once in a while I'm curious enough to look for it if I know it's a digitally captured image. Anything with unusual or challenging lighting will generally spur my interest in how it was taken. Chuck Norcutt Mike Lazzari wrote: >> Maybe you can tell me why do you prefer to leave these photographs >> 'untagged'. > It is an artifact of using the 'Save For Web' function of PS. I use it > because it's quick and easy and the result is small file sizes. The down > side is it strips exif data and tends to oversaturate by 10-15 percent. > I find that most people don't even know nor would they care if they did > know that files can be tagged and so the extra data is superfluous. > However a photo forum is an exceptional case and perhaps I should > include it. > > Now I'm curious. How many of you listeros view the exif data? > > Mike > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] sunset this evening, Mike Lazzari |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] nearly, or not quite, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] sunset this evening, Mike Lazzari |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] sunset this evening, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |