I agree that highlight detail has been lost but I prefer the shadow
detail if I had to choose. But I hope another crack at it will recover
both.
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> I believe you have mixed up the two versions, the previous one can see more
> details on the highlight areas.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] sunset this evening
>
>
> Wow! What a difference now that you can see the detail in the clouds.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>> Very nice !! - I could hardly find the whale, but I find it amazing how
>> did you manage to keep foreground shadow detail.
>>
>> Congratulations, Mike.
>>
>> Following an old advice of yours, I made a new version of "summer storm
>> at Maldonado bay", just to try Ken's technique to rescue shadow detail.
>>
>> Obviously, still need some practice: I'm not completely satisfied,
>> 'though now there are details in the shadows.
>>
>> I found it difficult to match colors after making analog gain, but it
>> also seems I committed a little of over sharpening since I applied some
>> IntelliSharpen II to the final .jpg, and am not too familiar with the
>> appropriate values to apply. Nonetheless, you won't find any trace of
>> halo, even at 200% in the original .tiff
>>
>> Anyway, here it is (again ... ! - sorry, list) - aRGB [beware].
>>
>> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/3726128438/sizes/o/>
>>
>> link goes directly to a 1280 pixel-wide .jpg.
>>
>> previous version here (same warnings apply):
>>
>> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/3409981821/sizes/o/>
>>
>> Fernando.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|