On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Moose<olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
conclusion to a lot of qualifiers:
> I'm not suggesting that such tests are not quite useful. I think the
> simple tests are pretty good analogs of overall lens performance and a
> good practical way to compare them. That they don't say it all is
> testified to by the decades of testimony of practical photographers
> about meaningful difference between lenses that aren't reflected in
> simple resolution tests.
>
> I am suggesting that a simple conclusion about whether a give sensor
> "out resolves" a given lens, and therefore whether there will be any
> benefit from a higher resolution sensor, based on these tests, is not
> supported by the methodology.
>
> Moose
I see what you mean.
Most of what you wrote, which I snipped, were qualifiers related to
sensor operation as a system. I think we must be clear when we talk
about a "sensor out-resolving a lens" on whether this is about the
entire sensor system or about a more limited feature set of that
system, i.e., the net number of pixels involved, etc. Chuck seemed to
be addressing the latter, and you the former, and I think these are
different. Straighten me out if I'm wrong.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|