- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4, 5 (monitor calibration), (continued)
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4, 5 (monitor calibration), C.H.Ling
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4, 5 (monitor calibration), Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4, 5 (monitor calibration), Chuck Norcutt
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4, 5 (monitor calibration), C.H.Ling
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4,5, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4,5, Ken Norton
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4,5,
C.H.Ling <=
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4,5, Ken Norton
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4,5, Chuck Norcutt
- Re: [OM] [IMG] first one with the 300mm f/4,5, Ken Norton
- [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5], Moose
- Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5], Ken Norton
- Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
- Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
- Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5], Chuck Norcutt
- Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5], Ken Norton
- Re: [OM] What about the overall image? [was first one with the 300mm f/4, 5], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
|