Hi, Dave:
I have three 35mm 2.0 lenses and several 50mm 1.8s with high and low serial
#s.Also an OM lens adapter for my digital 330. I'd be glad to perform the tests
you ask, on my digital OM body, but I'd like some input from more knowledgable
group members as to whether one can usefully evaluate the older lenses on a
digital body. The advantage of course would be quick image processing
turn-around. What are the disadvantages, if any.
My understanding is that images taken at f/2.0 on the 35mm lens would be less
sharp that images taken at f 2.8 with the same 35mm lens.
As Ever,
Orin Keplinger
near Chicago
___________________________________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dawid Loubser" <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 2:02:28 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [OM] Opinions and images wanted: OM Zuiko 35mm f/2.0
Hi All,
I have heard so many varied opinions on this, but have yet seen very
few images (preferably fairly high res)
to show the character and performance of the OM Zuiko 35mm f/2.0. I
know many (Ag Schnozz...) prefer the f/2.8
version, but my style of shooting is largely centered on shallow depth
of field, yet I like the 35mm focal length.
Could you guys perhaps reply with some opinions and images taken with
the 35mm f/2.0, preferably wide open? How would
you rate the performance compared to later 50/1.8 lenses?
thanks a million,
Dawid
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|