I will just try some more. This is the first time I have used the 24mm
for a pano. The lens does not exhibit any vignetting in normal use, so
something else must be at play. Previous panos with the 35mm lens do
not exhibit this behaviour.
As I said, I will just have to play some more.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Jun 25, 2009, at 8:43 PM, Ralf Loi wrote:
> <<
> I would not think so either (the aperture used was f11, BTW). Exposure
> was constant as well, except for one thing--I had left the camera on
> auto ISO, so it could be that ISO was changed from 160 to 320 for some
> of the images.
>>>
>
> You have to explain why, in a costant azimut, for every shot
> containing
> the sky, the sky is brighter in the middle of the shot and darker at
> the borders changing with a constant gradient. That is only consistent
> with vignetting. BTW we are speaking about a 24 mm, the other shots
> with the 50 mm don't exibit this problem.
> You could try a test with an uniform target: with a dark sky at night,
> shot a some seconds image pointing to the zenit, and soon afterwards
> another one pointing maybe 30 degree from the zenit and measure the
> density in the same area of the sky (the center in the first image and
> the related area in the second image).
>
> Ralf Loi
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|