For what it's worth, I used to find the M6 and plain OM3 complemented
eachother perfectly. Each does it's own thing perfectly and they feel
similar, somehow...
Tom
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 Jun 2009, at 21:39, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>> A used M6 usually goes LESS than an OM-3T!!! It's been hovering for
>> ~$1200 for years now.
>> That plus a couple lens will make you set for life.
>>
>
>
> Hmm. M6? E-3? M6? E-3? M6? E-3?....
>
> Fact is, at the moment, I don't have the funds for either, so it's
> just
> academic. Profits from the library project are earmarked for darkoom
> equipment upgrades.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|