Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Very nice and also very interesting. I'm wondering why the moon is
>>> rendered with 6 diffraction spikes. It look more like it was taken with an
>>> Newtonian telescope with a 3 arm spider than the 21/3.5.
Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> I felt frightened when read what you wrote on diffraction - though I had made
> an error during the scanning.
> Fact is that the amount of diffraction you're seeing is a little less than in
> the Provia.
>
Could this be an example of the halation, or whatever it is that Ken
natters on about, in some Fuji films, spreading out the intense brightness?
A. Digital and Koduck Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|