moosified .. how did you do that, Moose?
how did you minimize grain (at the same time, as a consequence of
reducing grain, shadow detail appears sharp)?
there's only one zone where a tree seems to be buried in the shadows,
that it goes not far enough - but it's negligible.
I didn't play with curves in PS, did so only before scanning - thought
it would be useless ... , same with NeatImage.
And now, I remember I hadn't check levels in PS - done so only in the
4000ED - but I don't think the clue is there, neither.
I was too busy getting the colors right, that took me lots of time - and
fortunately I remembered to make only a soft unsharp at the end.
It may take all my life, but if you wouldn't tell, I will find out :-)
Fernando.
Moose wrote:
> Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>
>> .... that this scan is better than the one I shown Piers this morning ...
>>
>>
>
> Much better. That one had weird halos around the silhouettes, for one
> thing. On the other hand, the new one takes the shadows down too far for
> my taste. I like it with a little les grain and more shadow detail.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/FGonzalezG/RuedeRivoli.htm>
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|