Subject: | Re: [OM] I've been on the sidelines for a bit, however this looks like a decent deal 4Ti |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 26 May 2009 10:17:58 -0500 |
> > Great for astrophotography, even though the 200/4 may be even better. The > 200/4 is a **very** sharp lens IF AND ONLY IF you get rid of vibration! > Agreed. The 200/4 is one awesome piece of glass, but you almost need to encase it in concrete to keep the vibration down. Without a doubt, vibration is the limiting factor on this lens. It's one of the rare lenses which can be used wide-open. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 23/05/2009: buttcrack!, Bob Whitmire |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Another weekend outing with the E-3, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] I've been on the sidelines for a bit, however this looks like a decent deal 4Ti, Carlos J. Santisteban |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] I've been on the sidelines for a bit, however this looks like a decent deal 4Ti, Carlos J. Santisteban |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |