Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/05/2009: goal!

Subject: Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/05/2009: goal!
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:02:15 +0100
If you look again at my post, Ken, I wrote, "That's an abnormal  
picture for you, Nathan: ..."

I suppose the implication was that each aspect bothered me, but I  
wrote it as an explanation why I would not say anything positive about  
the photo, and how it was different from any of the other photos of  
Nathan's that I had seen.

The noise is an aesthetic distraction (and detraction), but Nathan's  
motives for taking a photo in those circumstances do balance that  
detraction.

Chris


On 15 May 2009, at 18:49, Ken Norton wrote:

> What part of the noise in that picture bothers you?  I'd say  
> absolutely
> nothing. I think the imaging noise in integral to the success of the
> picture.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz