Moose,
That fits my samples too. My dad's lens with the slow aperture is an even
older one than yours: 3,234,xxx
The two good mij's that I have are in the 5,8xx,xxx range. They must have
improved them along the way!
--
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-747-3962
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
On 5/10/09 4:12 AM, "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wayne Harridge wrote:
>> Yeah, forgot to mention that. Thought to be the best optically, though
>> mechanically maybe not, I think some suffered from oily/sticky diaphragms.
>>
>
> Oly made a LOT of mij 50/1.8s. Of four miJs that have passed through my
> hands, with S/Ns between 3,500,000 and 3,700,000, one had a slightly
> slow diaphragm mechanism. The one I kept is 5,814,xxx, and very snappy.
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|