Yikes! Such a small camera shouldn't even have an f/12. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> It is a little strange, for ISO800 test the F31fd was using 1/340s F5.6 but
> the F200EXR was using 1/75s F12! It will sure hurt the details.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <usher99@xxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 5:12 AM
> Subject: [OM] clever use of available sensor real estate
>
>
>> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf200exr/page2.asp
>>
>> Moose might be amused that low light performance a few generations
>> later still doesn't really exceed the F30/31--the latter are still
>> expensive.
>>
>> Not many Moose sightings of late.
>>
>> A Trace Worried Mike
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|