As I understand it, there are no implications for artistic or
editorial uses. Flogging prints or dead horses, if you like. Use for
flogging product probably more complicated.
Tom
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Apr 2009, at 15:45, Chuck wrote:
> I note that many of your images contain what (though in public) are
> nevertheless probably copyrighted images. What's the implication of
> that for commercial use of your own images?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Tom Fenwick wrote:
>> Thanks to everyone who wished me well for my review yesterday.
>>
>> It was very encouraging and provided plenty of food for thought...
>> Based on
>> which I've put my Living the Dream folder in the shoebox and I now
>> offer
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/tom_77/upa
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/tom_77/upb
>>
>> This gives you some hints about what they liked best, and how I
>> will be
>> trying to work for the next few months (and possibly even two or
>> three new
>> images)...
>>
>> Very useful thing to have done. I'm still grinning about some of it.
>>
>> Tom
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|