I love the night shot along the river. I also liked the twig and leaves
but wish the DOF had covered the second leaf.
Chuck Norcutt
Patrick Moore wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I was sitting at the computer at the weekend, looking at the photos I'd
>
> just developed in Lightroom. I was happy with the results. I uploaded
>
> them to my (rather disfunctional) website and thought they looked rather
>
> dull and uninteresting in comparison. Initially I thought it was the
>
> gallery software I was using; perhaps something was going wrong in the
>
> conversion. Swapping between the uploaded copy and the local copy, I saw
>
> the uploaded one was significantly less vibrant, interesting and frankly,
>
> not how it looked in the local copy.
>
>
>
> Originall I was looking at it in Firefox, so switched to Safari and
>
> noticed that it seemed fine there. *click* went the switch in my head, and
>
> I remembered about colour profiles. Firefox was using it's internal
>
> profile, not that embedded in the image. Firefox 3 can use embedded
>
> profiles, it just chooses not to by default. My bad. I tuned on using
>
> embedded profiles, and it all just worked. Everything looked as I wanted.
>
>
>
> I went back to Lightroom, realised I had exported as AdobeRGB rather than
>
> sRGB. I've now fixed this and subsequent exports should be fine.
>
>
>
> So yes.
>
>
>
> For what it's worth, this was the set that prompted me to look into this,
>
> though previous ones were affected too.
>
>
>
> http://the.earth.li/~paddy/cgi-bin/range.pl?dir=april_2009_assorted_blend
>
>
>
> p.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|