Re: [OM] Confession

[John Hudson]

Hi Moose ........ I was thinking. What made you think that the pole was 
shown to be leaning other than through barrel distortion. Hopefully my 12-60 
is not a barrel distortion lens. The 14-45 kit lens was horrible for barrel 
distortion.

Would you have come to the same conclusion had the shot been, say, of the 
Leaning Tower of Pisa.

Now there is a challenge.

How about finding a shot of the leaning tower and making it stand up 
straight and thus gain fame beyond that of Leonardo of Pisa :-)

jh



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Confession


> John Hudson wrote:
>> http://www.johnhudsonphoto.com/788.html
>>
>
> Might one assume that the pole is neither bowed nor leaning?
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Hudson/StanagePole.htm>
> Otherwise lovely.
>
> The cause of perspective distortion is obvious. What lens did the barrel
> distortion?
>> The gravel road seen in the photo dates back to Roman times.
>>
>
> Apparently, gravel wears well.
>
> Moose
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/