Re: [OM] Loughborough

[Chuck Norcutt]

Oops!  2688 was a typo (or more likely a read error without glasses)  I 
meant 2686.  And you're right about 2689 as well.  I didn't read the box 
on the first pass.

Chuck Norcutt


Tom Fenwick wrote:
> I have to ask whether you meant 2686 or 2689, I think the comment could
> apply to either :-)
> 
> Tom
> 
> 2009/4/1 Chuck Norcutt
> 
>> Ya gotta love the juxtaposition of 2688.  :-)
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Tom Fenwick wrote:
>>> I spent the afternoon in Loughborough on Monday - quite good fun; lots of
>> my
>>> usual preoccupations:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/tom_77/loughborough
>>>
>>> Tom
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/