Subject: | Re: [OM] stabilization question |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:36:22 -0800 |
Sue Pearce wrote: > OK, here's what I want to know. What exactly is "sensor shift stabilization" > (or stabilisation)? Is the sensor actually moved physically Yes <http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/key=anti-shake> > or is it like consumer camcorders where the sensor is "cropped" a bit and the > camera moves the active area around? > No This only works so far for video (and very well), where subsequent frames are adjusted to keep major/central features aligned from frame to frame. For still photography, it would require individual frames to be composed of stacked sub-frames of very short exposure duration. Not technically possible for ordinary photography today. Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] stabilization question, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] pizza, was New Bessa Pics, Willie Wonka |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] stabilization question, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] pizza, was New Bessa Pics, Willie Wonka |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |