Sorry I'm arriving late and going through this thread very slowly, so
may anyone be so kind to explain me what's a "layered NeatImage a la
Moose" ?.
TIA
Fernando.
usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> The noise reduction
> routine is supposed to be as good as NI, but a layered NI ala Moose I
> suspect iis better. Last I checked they did not support your lenses
> with the 5D-- I would want a ringside seat for a DXO vs.
> Moose--hints of a grandmaster vs Deep Blue.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> Moose wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> The R-L processing is interesting and, in the example, clearly a bit
>> better than USM. But lets get right down to it. Anyone interested in
>> this stuff, I'd appreciate your votes on the alternates here.
>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/ARL_Sharp/Fox.htm>
>>
>> Problems I see with his presentation and examples ...
>>
>
> Simply looking at the on-screen examples provided, while also noting
> the
> problems you specify, to my eye the R-L processed image is the best of
> them, though it's a fine like between it and "Moose Pass 2B".
>
>
>
>
--
Dr. Fernando González Gentile M.D.
Av.L.P.Ponce 1526B - 11600 Montevideo, Uruguay.
Phone: +598 2 7084858
Fax: +598 2 7087396
<fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|