Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Risking the wrath of SWMBO

Subject: Re: [OM] Risking the wrath of SWMBO
From: Chris Crawford <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:07:11 -0500
Wow that's a lot of use! I guess having them repaired so often isn't so bad
then. I love how my Hasselblad lenses draw compared to my Mamiya 645 lenses.
If the Contax lenses are the same/similar then I understand why you want
one.


-- 
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-747-3962

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!



On 2/16/09 5:15 PM, "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> 
>> I never knew the Contax was so unreliable, I'm glad now that I
>> never got one.
>> 
> 
> 
> No, it's reliable enough.  It's just that this particular guy uses his all
> the time as his primary camera of choice.  The repair cycles are actually in
> line with the 'Blads.  Last year I asked him about them and he says his most
> used unit is now around a million exposures.
> 
> I'd personally pick Contax over the others in medium-format because of the
> optics.  I happen to love the way those lenses "draw".
> 
> AG


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz