>
> But there is NOTHING wrong with the E-1, and yet I'm not ready by that
> fact to declare the E-3 a stinker. It seems extremely accurate; it's
> just that accuracy is not always precisely what one is looking for.
> For now the E-1 has that 'je ne sais quoi" quality -- for me -- and
> I'm pretty confident that I know almost exactly what I will get with
> it, whereas I'm not at that level of familiarity yet with the E-3 and
> get both pleasant surprise as well as disappointments from it.
>
I believe that my thoughts regarding the color qualities from the E-1 are
well documented. If Olympus had just introduced an upgraded E-1 with more
resolution and a couple performance enhancements it would have been near
perfect. But the E-3 seems to be an entire reinvention of the camera with
little to know heritage of the E-1. It's a nice camera, but it ain't no
E-1.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|