Chris Barker wrote:
> Thanks, Moose. The result is attractive,
Thanks
> and I found it interesting that you used the -0.3EV version.
>
I did? I thought I used the 0EV one. That's what I meant to do. -0.3EV
was to far down, with a very few lost shadows tones.
> The day was crisp only among the trees; in the open it was still snowing and
> another shot of my wife coming out of her place of work resulted in her being
> out of focus as the system has (cleverly, I suppose) focused on the snow:
>
I could make it duller if you want. :-)
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|