Re: [OM] Micro 4/3 - the digital back?

[Chuck Norcutt]

Hmmm, yes, you're right.  But I'm not a potential customer for regular 
4/3 but might be for micro 4/3.

Chuck Norcutt

Wayne Harridge wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Chuck Norcutt  wrote:
>>
>> Some chatter on another list this morning reminds that the micro 4/3 has 
>>
>> an extremely short register distance.  Lenses that previously were not 
>> readily adaptable to other digital cameras (such as Canon FD and my MF 
>> Minolta 58mm f/1.2 and many others) can easily be adapted to micro 4/3. 
>>   Perhaps this is the digital back we were waiting for years ago?
>>
> 
> You can get an adapter for MF Minolta to 4/3, don't need micro 4/3 for that 
> one.
> 
> ...Wayne
> 
> Wayne Harridge
> 
> http://lrh.structuregraphs.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/