Hi John,
Yep, I'm still in Halifax. Been pretty busy with work lately
(probably a different job since we last talked), sadly I'm not
shooting much at all these days, but I'm really starting to hear
digital's siren call since while I love film I just don't have the
facilities (darkroom) or the time to take advantage of it.
On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:59 PM, John Hudson wrote:
> Hey Mr Dacey ...
>
> Are you still in Halifax, Nova Scotia ? Long time no hear from you.
> Unlike
> previous "you dummy" tone responses to my initial enquiry, the DPI
> section
> of your piece goes to the heart of the matter and confirms what I
> had been
> thinking from the outset. Thanks..
>
> John Hudson
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Dacey" <frugal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 9:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] dots and pixels per inch
>
>
>> A long time ago I actually wrote up a guide on this and put it on my
>> website because I got so tired of answering the questions regarding
>> ppi and dpi (and the associated misconceptions) that I'd deal with on
>> the photo groups on Usenet (dating how long ago I wrote this). It's
>> still available at:
>>
>> http://www.tildefrugal.net/photo/dpi.php
>>
>> On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:56 AM, John Hudson wrote:
>>
>>> To quote www.NetLingo.com
>>>
>>> "Resolution
>>> "A common computing term, it refers to several things. On a computer
>>> monitor, it is the number of pixels (horizontally) and lines
>>> (vertically) on
>>> the screen. For printers, resolution is a measurement expressed in
>>> dpi that
>>> describes the sharpness of a printed image. With sound boards, it
>>> is the
>>> number of bits used to encode sounds. And in business, it describes
>>> some
>>> form of mutual agreement."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My printer will work at the following print resolutions; draft, 360d
>>> [ots]
>>> per inch through various steps to 2880 d[ots] per inch
>>>
>>> Whenever I get prints done out of the house the photo lab asks for
>>> images at
>>> no less than 300 p[ixels] per inch.
>>>
>>> Is anyone able to provide a clear explanation of the relationship
>>> between
>>> pixels per inch and dots per inch ?
>>>
>>> Does an increase in pixels per inch generate an increase in dots
>>> per inch or
>>> are the two mutally exclusive ?
>>>
>>> If a printer's technology can only deliver a maximum or so many
>>> dots per
>>> inch is there a formula to show that an image resolution beyond so
>>> many
>>> pixels an inch is un-necessary ?
>>>
>>> If this question has already been flogged to death I apologise for
>>> asking
>>> again.
>>>
>>> John Hudson
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|