At first i questioned that too. He doesn't want registration or perfect
alignment. The idea seems to be yes: overlap and yes: different amount
of overlap for each set.
___________________________________
John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | www.zuiko.com
Olympus OM Service since 1977
Gallery: www.zuiko.com/album/index.html
Moose wrote:
> John Hermanson wrote:
>> Stephen Schaub had been using Lomos for his panorama work but has
>> started experimenting with the XA. He loves them.
>>
>> http://stephenschaub.com/
>>
>> XA vs. Lomo overall quality and sharpness video:
>>
>> http://figitalrevolution.com/2009/01/10/olympus-xa-vs-lomo-lca-and-lca-plus/#comment-450
>>
>
> Hey, nice plug for your services. Nice to find a new source of customers
> for a camera that had, I suppose, pretty much faded into obscurity for
> all but die-hard Oly-heads. My two still work fine. (Sssshh, I know, I
> know, AG but it's ok, really.)
>
> However ... What he does with them would probably have Maitani in fits.
> Almost all looks like crap to me, but tastes obviously vary.
>
> He doesn't indicate in the video any understanding of use of the rewind
> release for multiple exposures of individual frames with the XA. My
> recollection is that you can get pretty good registration with care, but
> must shoot a blank frame after the multiple exposure to avoid the next
> shot partially overlapping. Not that a separate shot overlapping part of
> a multiple exposure frame would be a drawback for this fellow. :-)
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|