Thanks for the update on the Sony. I remember the Carl Zeiss
lenses I used on a Contax G1. Those lenses always had a
certain magic to them. I can't say that any of my C*n*n lenses
have any such magic. They are functional but not magical.
Even compared to some of my favorite OM lenses, the CZ glass
had something extra.
Welcome back. Let us know if you need any ice for swelling.
WayneS
At 08:47 PM 12/27/2008, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>Thanks mate.
>I was looking at the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 on an a900.
>Frankly it's awesome - stunning image quality. My Canon 24-70mm is
>great but the Sony CZ seems to have an extra indefinable magic, a
>sort of punch and sparkle. One review I read scored for build
>quality, image quality and performance and simply gave it three 10's.
>Hard to disagree. The only faults they found with exhaustive testing
>were so insignificant as to be irrelevant. I really, really didn't
>want to send it back.
<snip>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|