Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OM) not - Bill Henson in Oz

Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) not - Bill Henson in Oz
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:28:31 +0000
Just so, Chuck.

Chris

On 14 Dec 2008, at 02:25, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> It sometimes helps to ask yourself if you'd be studying the image at  
> all
> if there was an unknown name attached.  :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Wayne Harridge wrote:
>>> But then perhaps they don't transfer to the screen very well.  There
>>> are some interesting mixes of colours, but many of them are too dark
>>> to see.  You'd have to have a pretty light place to find the subject
>>> in some of them.
>>
>> I agree Chris, some of them don't transfer to the screen well and  
>> the reason
>> is that the images didn't transfer very well to the original  
>> prints !  I've
>> seen some of his original prints (I think it was a 30yr  
>> retrospective in
>> Melbourne a few years ago), some printed maybe 2m wide, some I  
>> thought were
>> very disappointing considering his reputation.  You can understand  
>> that the
>> technical quality might be a bit poor given that he was shooting in  
>> very low
>> light, but in some cases the actual subject matter was just not  
>> interesting.
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz