Piers,
I love that registration number.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
To: "'Olympus Camera Discussion'" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Moose: Example of Fujifilm F10 Resolution
> Here's on on the UK register, Chris!
>
> http://flickr.com/photos/captain_flynn/2008697256/sizes/o/
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Barker [mailto:ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 08 December 2008 08:54
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] Moose: Example of Fujifilm F10 Resolution
>
> That's an interesting lighting setup, Jim. I should think that it borders
> on the illegal, though. The navigation lights (clear and green ones) are
> supposed to be visible from a certain range of angles in the UK (120 deg
> for the coloured one, I think), but the chrome or
> alloy trim will reflect the light outside that angle, I should think.
> Also, the clear light is supposed to be visible from the rear, but the
> landing light (or taxi light) structure will obstruct that view.
>
> But perhaps the FAA has different rules for lighting from the CAA.
>
> Chris
>
> On 8 Dec 2008, at 06:50, jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Moose,
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|