OK< after more photos, the problem is...
it wasn't focused probably before :-)
the 50/2 OM is spectacular on the E-3, that's all I have to say.
At 12:59 AM 12/6/2008, you wrote:
>Wait a minute, if MF-1 and MA-1 differ in thickness, doesn't that
>mean one of them is not optimal? I have a generic adapter, and it
>looks to be slightly off (backfocus), could that be the reason?
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly,
please use richard at imagecraft.com)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|