>
> . . and I looked at the trends a couple months ago
> (monitor sales figures) . . . the public is increasingly buying the
> 16:10 wide-screens, for both desktop and laptop, and for desktop
> monitors they're rapidly drifting toward the larger 19-20 inch.
I don't get it. Why do you want a computer monitor as short as a TV ?
unless that's all you use it for. My 1600x1200 4:3 is great but
increasingly hard to find. The next monitor I get will probably be
1920x1200. The 1200 height is OK so the added width is good. Anything
higher and I couldn't open the window anyway. Still 4:3 is a better
shape for a monitor IMO.
Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|