Very tricky there using your wide angle lens to accentuate the
foreground papers and try to give the appearance of messiness when none
is actually present. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
James R wrote:
> Well I only qualify on the dual use - I have to make do with the back
> end of our sitting room. The shear stuff aspect would have been
> greater pre-tax season as I hadn't sorted out papers for over a year
> (the tail end of it all is to the fore).
>
> And I would score pretty highly in the sore neck stakes if that was a
> category, hence the contraptions that's labelled a chair by some.
>
> http://gallery.me.com/jamesroyall#100178
>
>
>
> On 2 Nov 2008, at 20:33, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>> Only one grand prize I think and the judging criteria have already
>> started to appear -
>> - The sheer quantity of 'stuff' - papers, bits of camera, whatever.
>> (Ian's missus?)
>> - The number of peripherals, especially if they have stuff heaped on
>> them. And cabling.
>> - Quantity of shelving and cabinets, especially if nothing is filed
>> and there's no order.
>> - Imaginative use of old, decrepit or inappropriate furniture.
>> - Difficulties overcome - I like Chris' 5ft ceiling, for instance.
>> - Multiple use - Bob's is obviously a spare bedroom and Laundry as
>> well.
>>
>> A screen shot of someone else's desk is necessary.
>> Special mention for imaginative use of companion animal.
>> Andrew Fildes
>> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/11/2008, at 1:57 AM, J. Van Brimmer wrote:
>>
>>> No problem. It's all fun. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, I want to know when the official judging will begin. OK, who
>>> will
>>> be the judge and what will the categories be?
>>>
>>> We could have a single judge, or take a vote, and here's a couple of
>>> categories for starters:
>>>
>>> 1. The tidiest (In the literal sense of the word)
>>>
>>> 2. The messiest (Literally)
>>>
>>> 3. ? (Surely there's more)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> jv
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Andrew Fildes
>>> <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Whoops - abused the wrong guy. Sorry.
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's 'altitudinally challenged' - you of all people should know
>>>> that. Vertically challenged means that you keep falling over. An
>>>> early symptom is the inability to get a level horizon in landscapes.
>>>> Andrew Fildes
>>>> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.5/1761 - Release Date: 11/1/2008
> 7:56 PM
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|