Thanks Moose!
I think your version 1 is an improvement on my original, while
versions 2 and 3 are too radical. My original or version 1 are closest
to what the scene actually looked and felt like.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Nov 1, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Moose wrote:
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> This is probably my most eclectic PAW of the year so far. Not only
>> is there a variety of subjects, but I also used all the photo
>> equipment I own: the two Olympus DSLRs and the Bronica 645. The
>> results are here:
>>
>> http://www.fotocycle.dk:80/paws/?page_id=164
>>
>> and as always, comments and critique are welcome and appreciated.
>>
> Weak, I'm weak. But I did hold off for a week to see if the urge would
> pass. :-)
>
> Not better, but certainly a different feeling. And a poster image
> for my
> argument that most filters aren't needed for digital.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Wajsman/43.htm>
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|