I have an older copy of FastStone and have given it to my kids. But I
have continued to stick with BreezeBrowser since I have seen FastStone
as an incomplete imitation (and it also helps that I paid for it long
ago). But maybe it's time to look again.
Chuck Norcutt
WayneS wrote:
> At 11:18 PM 10/26/2008, you wrote:
>
>>> With my system, I have not found a way to display RAW files as thumbnails,
>>> hence the need for the jpegs. Otherwise, I would shoot RAW alone.
>>>
>> Faststone image viewer works fine and the price is right. Just have to
>> beat the Adobe downloader and Oly master into submission first or they
>> keep popping up wanting to do the work. Both have rather clunky
>> interfaces compared to Fastone which is quick and easy and free!
>>
>> Mike
>
> I prefer FastStone viewer over either Lightroom or Bridge. And what
> Mike says. However, it seems much faster with Can*n raw files than ORF
> files. FastStone has improved considerably since I first started using it.
>
> WayneS
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1749 - Release Date: 10/27/2008
> 7:57 AM
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|