Subject: | [OM] Re: temple |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:15:34 -0400 |
I like the middle one best. I think the problem with the layers/masks version is that the building is too bright relative to the dark sky which makes it look unnatural. Somewhere between the two is probably the right mix. Chuck Norcutt Brent wrote: > Hi > > Have been digging through my old photos to try to find some keepers > that could be pulled from the rejected pile while practising my PS > skills. I have never really fully grasped the concepts of masking / > channel mixing, and tend to make it up as I go... really should do a > course some time. > > This one was taken with my OM-1 on a FujiColor 160C film which was > seriously dodgy (lesson: don't buy film off *bay). > > http://phogra.com/g/v/Temple/ > > I quite like the B&W results - a bunch of layers / masks went into the > last version to make the temple stand out without affecting the tree > too much. Looks a bit fake maybe... ahh well... :) > > Brent > > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.2/1741 - Release Date: 10/23/2008 > 7:54 AM > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] temple, Brent |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: temple, Ralf Loi |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] temple, Brent |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: temple, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |