Oh wow... that's nice...
Not too expensive either.
Sold.
Thanks Moose. I've seen your posts on this before but these examples
are very impressive compared to what I was able to achieve in other
software.
Brent
On 03/10/2008, at 7:30 PM, Moose wrote:
> Brent wrote:
>> ....
>>
>> I had a go at removing the grain but my photoshop skills couldn't
>> come up with anything that didn't look 'soft focus'.
>
> It's probably not all due to your PS skills. One weakness of PS, at
> least through CS3, is the noise reduction. It's far from the
> standard of
> independent tools.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Rutherford/Girl1.htm>
> and. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Rutherford/Girl2.htm>
>
> Both treatments used two different applications of NeatImage, one for
> low detail areas and the other where more detail needs to be
> preserved,
> mostly the hair.
>
>> Not that I expected grainless photos with a 1600 ISO film, but I
>> guess I've become accustomed to the results people are producing
>> with their new digital gear now.
>>
> Digital has taken the lead in that area generally. The good news is
> that
> digital darkroom tools help a lot.
>
> Moose
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|