Funny you say that, Stephan. I did use Scala quite a bit back when I
still projected slides, but I always found it one of the hardest films
to scan, much more difficult than any B&W negative film I used.
Here are some examples from 2001 and 2002, all scanned with a Nikon
LS-2000:
http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/7.jpg
http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/11.jpg
http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/13.jpg
http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/27.jpg
http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/41.jpg
http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/51alt1.jpg
http://www.nathanfoto.com/paw/2002/2002_2.jpg
There are more on my PAW pages from 2001-2004.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Sep 8, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Stephan Van den Zegel wrote:
>
> It's a very good film to be scanned in a film scanner... (easy to
> handle,
> clean results...) easier than any BW negative... (I use a Nikon
> coolscan)
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] De
> la part
> de Wayne Harridge
> Envoyé : lundi 8 septembre 2008 14:40
> À : olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [OM] Re: AGFA Scala 200 ISO b/w slide film
>
>
>>
>> One good reason... it's very efficient when scanned...
>>
>
> I'm not really sure what you mean.
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
