Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [OT] Seriously who can afford one of these?

Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] Seriously who can afford one of these?
From: Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:20:13 +1000
Bottom line - if you're shooting your kids at birthday parties and Christmas it 
would be difficult to justify !

...Wayne


> Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> AS wrote:
> > http://www.calumetphoto.com/item/HA1503/?a=CM01
> >
> > Price of a new small car!! 
> >   
> Oddly enough, businesses buy all sizes and sorts of vehicles all the 
> time. Equipment is evaluated on a cost-benefit basis. If the additional 
> income and/or cost savings exceed the cost, the purchase is justified.
> 
> Capable manager/owners make analyses that work out more often than not 
> and stay in business.
> > After they get "out-dated" - what happens? 
> >   
> With any luck, they have more than paid for themselves and the operating 
> 
> and maintenance costs. From an accounting standpoint, they have been 
> depreciated. Again, with competent management, the life for book 
> depreciation purposes (which may vary from tax) has approximated actual 
> useful life, and it is sold or dumped with little effect on the books.
> 
> Obsolescence for a business is based on the ability to get the job done, 
> 
> not what's latest. So many pieces of equipment in many businesses are 
> productive long after they are out-dated and written off. Some can be 
> extraordinarily profitable at that point.
> 
> I suppose you would have been shocked to hear what a large company I 
> worked for paid for a custom overhead, 4x5 copy camera over 20 feet 
> long, camera room, darkroom, custom designed giant rear projection 
> display system and the large amount of space and remodeling to 
> accommodate all this stuff. Then they liked it so much that they bought 
> and installed about 20 of the room size viewers in Division offices. 
> Monthly operating costs were well above the cost of this little camera 
> whose price shocks you.
> 
> When the way that part of the business operated changed and technology 
> marched on, all that stuff was dumped. Seemed a shame to me, as I had 
> conceived and directed its creation, but it had done its job well for 
> maybe 15 years. From an accounting standpoint, it all had zero book 
> value by then, my primary operator was able to retire and we found 
> another job for his assistant. La, la, la, la, life goes on.
> 
> You did say "seriously", no?
> 
> Moose
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================

Wayne Harridge

http://lrh.structuregraphs.com

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz