You should read the article before disputing the numbers. The numbers
are based on pixel dimensions, not physical sensor sizes or ratios.
Chuck Norcutt
Ken Norton wrote:
> I'm not sure that the A2 outresolves the lens. I think it just outresolves
> technique. Back on my website, I had published lens tests on the A1. I was
> trying to figure out the sharpest apertures. What amazed me was that with
> the exception of wide-open and F11, there was almost no difference between
> any aperture at any focal length. Granted, once you got past F7.1 things
> started to slide downhill, but not by much. I found that the greatest
> resolution trick in the book for the KM cameras was processing the images in
> RawShooter. (RIP)
>
> Also, I challenge the numbers on the 4/3 format. When talking resolution
> limits with digital, the diagonal measurement no longer applies. The sensor
> height of the 4/3 sensor is almost that of APS-C. Feel free to use the same
> calculation for APS-C.
>
> With almost all of my lenses, I can go out to F8 without hitting defraction
> limits.
>
> AG
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1611 - Release Date: 8/14/2008
> 6:20 AM
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|