That's a bit petulant - clearly Reevoo.com are a respected academic
source and I'm sure that their interviewers were well trained, their
interview schedules free of any possibility of generating minor
invalidities and inaccuracies and their sample of 2000 respondents
was properly randomised and structured (no, not contradictory).
Beyond that, it has the grim ring of plausibility to it.
Andrew Fildes (former market research interviewer - hey, we can't all
put ourselves through university by more legitimate work like table
top dancing).
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 10/08/2008, at 6:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
> :-)
>
> But it sounds as if you're believing rather too much of what you read
> on the Internet, Bill. That's almost like believing everything you
> read in a newspaper ...
>
> Much of what is written in newspapers is at least part fiction,
> especially in the UK at this time of the year. And when I was in the
> USA I found bo**ocks in many places as well.
>
> Chris
>
> On 10 Aug 2008, at 09:36, Bill Pearce wrote:
>
>>
>> Went to DPR and there is a story on a survey of Britons that
>> revealed that
>> over a quarter of you don't know how to operate your digital
>> cameras, and
>> don;t know how to use the manual. OK, I have some troubles there,
>> too, but
>> listen to what was in the rest of the top ten.
>>
>> You also have problems with your washing machines (#4), your TV
>> remote
>> control (#8) and your microwave ovens (#10)!
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|