Subject: | [OM] Re: A mini-digital M (!)? |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:57:46 +1000 |
Still AF rather than MF though. Think Contax G. Too much to hope for. Sigh. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 05/08/2008, at 5:42 PM, Richard Man wrote: > A micro 4/3rd with half of the flange to film distance, meaning no > space for a mirror box. DPreview think this necessitates an EVF or > LCD focusing, me think this could also mean RF focusing! ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: DPReview "Olympus/Panasonic announce Micro Four Thirds", Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: DPReview "Olympus/Panasonic announce Micro Four Thirds", montsnmags@xxxxxxxxx |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] A mini-digital M (!)?, Richard Man |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: A mini-digital M (!)?, Chris Barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |