Scott's got some great images there to illustrate his point. The first
one (753) is truly gorgeous. But apart from distance and how to focus a
reversed lens contraption the principal rationale for using the lens
reversed is that it puts lens, subject and focal plane back into the
relative positions the lens was designed for. When a non-macro lens is
used normally the subject is farther from the lens than the image
plane... and that's what the lens is designed for. But in macro use
these relationships get turned on their heads since the subject can
easily be closer to the lens than the image plane. Reversing the lens
restores the normal balance of things and gets the angles of light beams
passing through the lens back closer to the original design criteria.
Chuck Norcutt
Scott Peden wrote:
> Reversing the lens allows you to get real close.... seriously close, close
> enough you are blocking your light.....and doesn't allow you to back off.
>
> I think the links here are with a 14-45 reversed, hand held, as you have to
> move the camera closer or further way to do any focusing. Most of the
> subjects are the width of a tooth pic. Usually only the center third of the
> FOV is in focus, sometimes I got lucky.
>
> And last but not least, it was fun.
>
> My rule of thumb that seemed to work was, 14 mm lens meant the FOV was 14mm,
> a 45mm lens was 45mm FOV (wide) I had extreme difficulties once I used 150
> to 200 mm lenses, seemed most effective at about 60-100, and at that point,
> I was getting about the same thing as you can with a EX25 and 50 mm macro,
> or a 35 mm macro (assuming your using an Olympus E series camera...... we do
> talk about these on this list, don't we :-)?
>
> I don't think I have any cropped shots in this list.
>
> Reverse Macro 14-45, E-500
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/404273753/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/403160554/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/403142621/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/391269067/
> the crop on this was about 1/10th of the outside edges, looks like the
> worlds tiniest cricket to me, that tall thing to the left is a moss branch
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/403142618/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/377604996/
> a lot of 14-45 pics on this page;
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/page10/
>
>
> Reverse Macro 40-150, E 500
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/370473789/
> I now know this is commonly called a pixie cup
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/370473788/
>
>
>
> 50 mm Macro with EX 25 E-330
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/1737309220/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/2184431113/
>
> 50 mm macro reversed E-330
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/2184428325/
>
> 70-300 with EC 14 macro E-330
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/55838750@N00/2185215308/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Jim Nichols
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 4:20 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: More Experimentation
>
>
> Moose,
>
> First off, I'm cheap. I use what I have at hand, or, can obtain cheaply. I
>
> have a 50/1.4 Takumar, but have it dedicated to my film SLR. That left the
> 55/1.8 and 2x extender free to play with.
>
> I assume that, to reverse the lens, the adapter would have to attach to the
> filter threads. I really don't understand what this would do for me, unless
>
> it would give me a different distance to the sensor which could be used
> beneficially.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 5:41 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re: More Experimentation
>
>
>> I'm enjoying watching this little series of experiments.
>>
>> My first approach, given the lenses at hand and an M42 adapter, would
>> have been to put the M42 Adaptall2 on my Tamron 90/2.5 macro lens and
>> shoot away.
>>
>> As I think about it, I wonder if an auto bellows for the pentax screw
>> mount exists. With double cable release, it would make things quicker to
>> operate. But then with a standard lens, reversing it might give better
>> IQ results, and that puts paid to aperture automation.
>>
>> Have you thought about an adapter to reverse the lens?
>>
>> An Inquiring Moose
>>
>> Jim Nichols wrote:
>>> In past years, I have used a Takumar with a 2x extender to obtain
>>> occasional closeups with a film SLR. I wanted to find out what this
>>> combination would do on the E-510.
>>>
>>> The linked shot was made with a Takumar 55/1.8 lens and 2x extender
>>> mounted on a chipped adapter on the E-510. Focusing was done wide open,
>>> then the lens was stopped down to either 4 or 5.6 for the shot.
>>>
>>> I tried this technique with faster moving subjects and had no luck at
>>> all. This little fellow sat still long enough for me to get the job
>>> done. The lens combination appears to have possibilities if I can just
>>> pick the right subjects.
>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Another+Small+One.tif.html
>>>
>>> Critiques and comments welcomed.
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.10/1586 - Release Date: 8/1/2008
> 6:59 PM
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|