Wayne,
Guess you are correct. I was figuring one stop loss, but it really is two.
Thanks for the correction.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 5:15 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: More Experimentation
>
>> As you say,
>> it focuses to .45meter, or less than 18 inches, and becomes,
>> on the E-510,
>> the equivalent of a 220mm f/2.5 lens.
>>
>
> f3.6 actually
>
>> Not bad, for minimum cost.
>>
>
> certainly worked well for that shot. As you say, choose the right
> subjects
> as it's a bit cumbersome to focus wide open then stop down for the
> exposure.
> For static macro images the lack of autofocus and auto diaphragm isn't a
> problem.
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|