My brane hurts. I can see sense on both sides of the argument.
What we need is an old and wise Pen F user to clarify the issue.
How did a 200mm behave on that reduced format?
Damn - I expected to get beaten up over my thoughts on football, not
this!
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 30/07/2008, at 7:35 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> Personally, I use that rule to apply to EQUIVELENT 35mm format. For
> example, if you can handhold a 50mm lens on a 35mm camera to 1/60th
> of a
> second, I extend that to mean that I need 1/90 to handhold an 80mm
> lens on a
> 645 camera. For my 4/3 camera, also work in the same equivelents:
> I get
> satisfactory performance handholding my 200/4 lens on the E-1 at
> 1/400 of a
> second.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|