Subject: | [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile? |
---|---|
From: | "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:08:41 -0500 |
Since you mentioned that you'd like to also get the E-3, I'd keep the 420. The formfactor is such that you'll appreciate the compactness over IS. It really is a special camera. Of course, the RIGHT answer is that you need all of them. AG ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Chuck's 'round-the-country tour, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?, IanG |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?, GMcGrath |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?, IanG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |