Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?

Subject: [OM] Re: E-420 vs 520...is IS worthwhile?
From: Richard Man <richard-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:58:19 -0700
I am considering getting a 420 or 520 for a backup to the E-3, and I 
am definitely leaning toward the 520 because of the IS. I know some 
people do not engage the IS "unless necessary" but I just leave it on 
all the time. The shots it help are well worth any non-problems.

At 12:33 PM 7/25/2008, Rob Harrison wrote:

>As far as I can tell IS is the only real advantage of the e-520.
>(Besides longer battery life and a couple extra direct buttons.) Oh
>esteemed listers, is it worth it? I suspect so, but I'm wondering if
>you all can back it up with experience.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Rob in Seattle

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com) 


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz